NOTES:
How does the film visually help tell the story?
How does it help deliver the message and transfer the viewer into the film?
First Scene Viewed:
Very realistic wardrobes
Language remains what it is, only translated in text at bottom of screen
Character names seem to be real, believeable
Origins real, justifiable
Use of typewriter
Woman obtaining job...not usual?
Based on historical reference, solidity (i.e. Hitler's 56th birthday)
Reality of family members dealing with war-time conflict, have families at home to consider
Mass burning, rebellion by civilians
Use versus no use of politics
Working, middle, lower classes all seen evacuating
Children, women as troops; know no better than to fight, know nothing else
"In times like these, there are no civilians."
Uncontrollable shaking of hand
Next Scene Viewed:
War going on- seems quite realistic; sounds, picture, setting, events
Telephone call? (Monkhe to internist)
Underground/basement area with german script on walls
Officers who disobey are shot immediately
Women (mostly elderly) all contained in one room
Younger women trying to step in, give advice?
Honor, betrayal, loyalty, humanity
Next Scene Viewed:
Leader and his wife kill themselves
Disposal of bodies (salute)
Silent invasion by Russians- surrender?
Female and child- characters continue to get stronger
Suicide
Re-cap of character's individual outcomes
REACTION:
What a moving film, honestly. Downfall did an excellent job of portraying the real-life struggles that the world endured during a time when people had to make quick decisions that would affect the rest of their lives, live or die. Perhaps this is the reason that I watch so much of the history channel; i'm a sucker for accurately depicted documentary-type films. Everything from the costumes that the actors wore to the realistic sense of a young boy standing up for his country in a time of crisis exemplified the severity of such a crucial time in history. The movie did a great job of showing the power that Hitler had, as the people in the film- men, women, children, and elderly- just stopped what they were doing and watched him, listened to him, and responded to what he said. He said go and they jumped. The appearance on each character's face really brought to life exactly how that person was feeling, whether it was sad, freightened, brave, or strong. The viewer always knows what emotions the character is experiencing, down to a T, as if the viewer were walking in the actor's shoes. The film is not so much about aesthetics and appearance, but rather, about the history of a world somewhat known. A lot of times people only know to appreciate the visual appearance of a film rather than what the film is really about, or what it's based on. It's important to obtain an appreciation for and understanding of the validity, depth, and tragedy behind a film like Downfall.
Small details that the director used in the film, such as Hitler's hand that continously, uncontrollably shook throughout his time in the film. I don't know if his hand actually did this but I can imagine that he had some sort of problem relative compulsive shaking. The camera angles that the director used were intense and almost necessary. The scenes that took place in the underground shelter-type area were really shot in a sheltered area which is evident when the camera follows characters through hallways rather than just moving the camera left to right in front of a stage. It's as if the camera is chasing the actors to obtain remarkable, realistic shots. Even when the actual bombs and guns are going off, outside and inside of the shelter, the camera shakes and the sounds intensify and rumble; so lively and imaginable.
I cannot seem to steer away from the young boy in the film who is determined to fight this war for his country; was this a historical character? I can't help but wonder why this character was thought of. In a sense, we see the boy as the first one to step up and fight the battle, willingly, and then we see him experience his first trench-war, and then we see him leading a woman away from danger and into the future- ironic? Aren't children supposed to be the followers? Perhaps he is demonstrating hope for the future, that the war will come to an end and life will go on. Certainly an interesting addition to the underlying message of the film.